If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause problems for people.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower for exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. safe distance to live from cell phone tower 's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used cell phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away the tower is.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea however, people who live close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.