Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell System?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell System?

If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

https://sweet-stern.hubstack.net/how-long-away-can-a-single-be-from-the-5g-mobile-tower-system-before-becoming-harmful  are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause problems for people.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower

Have you ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further you are from it.

While this sounds like a good idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For  what is a safe distance from a cell tower , a study from 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who were distance from them.



This study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a shield against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.