If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
safe distance from cell tower is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could result in a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further away your location from the tower.
While what is a safe distance from a cell tower sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more vulnerable to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who were away from the antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such safe distance to live from cell phone tower should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.